https://www.mominleggings.com/pts78ddj While waiting for a new computer that will make my experiments with voxels more comfortable (even a 64x64x64 grid is slow on my laptop) I decided to try some less expensive effects, starting with the volumetric lights as described in GPU Pro 5 by Nathan Vos from Guerilla Games.

https://ncmm.org/znrgkko4jy

First of all I highly recommend you to read this chapter (and the whole book !), there is a lot of useful tricks, and I only scratch the surface. There is also the excellent GDC talk “Taking Killzone Shadow Fall Image Quality into the Next Generation” by Michal Valient. You can download the slides on the Guerrilla Games publication page. It’s not just about volumetric lights, but the whole talk is really interesting (especially the part on the nice trick to achieve 60fps for multiplayer using temporal reprojection, I found it particularly awesome. But be careful, nowadays you can be sued for being awesome …).

A similar approch has been use in the upcoming game “Lords of the Fallen” and is described by Benjamin Glatzel for the conference Digital Dragon. You can see the slides here and the presentation here, it’s a really good source of informations.

https://fotballsonen.com/2024/03/07/ai9jdlt8f9 I started with a directional light, the sun light in my case, that will affect the whole scene.
First of all I needed some kind of shadow map. I could have created one by ray marching in my voxel grid as I’ve done with point lights. As there is only one light it’s easy to store the distance from the occluder. But again my laptop GPU is really slow and it would have been annoying, so I started with a really basic shadow map implementation.

Order Tramadol Discount The idea is to “ray march” from the world position of the current pixel to the camera position, and for each step check if the current position can be seen by the light or not, using the informations from the shadow map. For each step the light scattered in the camera direction is accumulated, using the Henyey-Greenstein phase function.

https://www.worldhumorawards.org/uncategorized/q7usgqgkp It’s really simple, but as often with raymarching it can quickly become expensive as it require a certain amount of rays to capture details, and that’s why the ray marching is done in a downscaled texture.

https://www.jamesramsden.com/2024/03/07/sd8od30h The pseudo code for the raymarching looks like this:

https://www.lcclub.co.uk/c8g7svbp // Mie scaterring approximated with Henyey-Greenstein phase function. float ComputeScattering(float lightDotView) { float result = 1.0f - G_SCATTERING * G_SCATTERING; result /= (4.0f * PI * pow(1.0f + G_SCATTERING * G_SCATTERING - (2.0f * G_SCATTERING) *      lightDotView, 1.5f)); return result; } float3 worldPos = getWorldPosition(input.TexCoord); float3 startPosition = g_CameraPosition; float3 rayVector = endRayPosition.xyz- startPosition; float rayLength = length(rayVector); float3 rayDirection = rayVector / rayLength; float stepLength = rayLength / NB_STEPS; float3 step = rayDirection * stepLength; float3 currentPosition = startPosition; float3 accumFog = 0.0f.xxx; for (int i = 0; i < NB_STEPS; i++) { float4 worldInShadowCameraSpace = mul(float4(currentPosition, 1.0f), g_ShadowViewProjectionMatrix); worldInShadowCameraSpace /= worldInShadowCameraSpace.w; float shadowMapValue = shadowMap.Load(uint3(shadowmapTexCoord, 0)).r; if (shadowMapValue > worldByShadowCamera.z) { accumFog += ComputeScattering(dot(rayDirection, sunDirection)).xxx * g_SunColor; } currentPosition += step; } accumFog /= NB_STEPS;

https://musiciselementary.com/2024/03/07/lkt0447u1t Here is the result of the raw ray marching with 100 steps:

https://elisabethbell.com/arv2vubbm

It looks pretty good, but even with an halved resolution it’s still 7.6 ms on my Geforce 630m.

Let’s see what it looks like with a lot less, 10,  ray marching steps :

https://asperformance.com/uncategorized/r38j2c35

Order Cheap Tramadol Online Yeah, it’s pretty ugly.

https://worthcompare.com/o1ielccvh But as with the ray marched shadows from my previous post, a bayer matrix will add some noise, and help to capture more details with less samples.

https://asperformance.com/uncategorized/qzbgh1w ditherPattern[4][4] = {{ 0.0f, 0.5f, 0.125f, 0.625f}, { 0.75f, 0.22f, 0.875f, 0.375f}, { 0.1875f, 0.6875f, 0.0625f, 0.5625}, { 0.9375f, 0.4375f, 0.8125f, 0.3125}}; // Offset the start position. startPosition += step * ditherValue;

Purchasing Tramadol Overnight

http://countocram.com/2024/03/07/k6uphh2wh And the next step is a bilateral blur in order to have a smooth result.

https://elisabethbell.com/i0n779fw I always find the effect of the noise + blur amazing for ray marching !

The main issue with downsampling is that when you apply the result to the full resolution scene all the edges are blurry and/or pixelated, as you can see in the screenshot. This is fixed in the last step, a bilateral upsampling.
To write the value of a full resolution pixel I take the values of the four nearest downscaled pixels, and weights them according to their depth, as for a bilateral blur.
On the X axis for an even pixel I will sample the current and the left pixel, and the right one for an odd pixel. The same apply for the Y axis.

https://www.jamesramsden.com/2024/03/07/1it1dbk26wy   float4 main(const PS_INPUT input) : SV_TARGET { float upSampledDepth = depth.Load(int3(screenCoordinates, 0)).x; float3 color = 0.0f.xxx; float totalWeight = 0.0f; // Select the closest downscaled pixels. int xOffset = screenCoordinates.x % 2 == 0 ? -1 : 1; int yOffset = screenCoordinates.y % 2 == 0 ? -1 : 1; int2 offsets[] = {int2(0, 0), int2(0, yOffset), int2(xOffset, 0), int2(xOffset, yOffset)}; for (int i = 0; i < 4; i ++) { float3 downscaledColor = volumetricLightTexture.Load(int3(downscaledCoordinates + offsets[i], 0)); float downscaledDepth = depth.Load(int3(downscaledCoordinates, + offsets[i] 1)); float currentWeight = 1.0f; currentWeight *= max(0.0f, 1.0f - (0.05f) * abs(downscaledDepth - upSampledDepth)); color += downscaledColor * currentWeight; totalWeight += currentWeight; } float3 volumetricLight; const float epsilon = 0.0001f; volumetricLight.xyz = color/(totalWeight + epsilon); return float4(volumetricLight.xyz, 1.0f); }

 

And here is the final result :

Tramadol Purchase Online  

Order Tramadol Cod Overnight

 

Tramadol Order Overnight Some screenshots from other points of view, with 15 steps:

 

https://elisabethbell.com/vts2s70 I’m pretty happy with the results so far. It’s fast (around 2ms on my GPU), and unlike the old school godray/sunbeam algorithms the volumetric effect can be sen even if the source is not in the screen as it relies on shadow maps.

For now, in my implementation the fog density is uniform. The GPU Pro chapter gives a lot of informations on how to control the density, and it really improves the result. My idea is to use the empty voxels of my grid to store density values. Then I should be able to update those values, with things like fog emitters, wind, collisions, etc. I tried with a 64x64x64 grid but the precision is not good enough, so I’ll try with a larger grid size.

Tramadol Prescriptions Online For an alternative technique you can have a look at “Volumetric Fog: Unified compute shader based solution to atmospheric scattering”, used in Assassin’s Creed 4 and described by Bart Wronski at SIGGRAPH (slides are available here ). It’s more complicated, but it may be faster (especially for multiple lights) and using an intermediate 3D texture is really interesting as it allow to do more advanced calculations.

https://musiciselementary.com/2024/03/07/bokqrg7e As I said at the beginning it’s just a start, and yet I find it already improves the sensation of depth of the scene. It reinforces the impact of lights as they no longer only impact the geometry. And with a low number of steps the cost it’s fast enough, so it’s really something I want to deepen !